Separated by Glass: How COVID-19 Revealed the Hidden Mental Health Crisis of Aging and the Fight to Restore Connection

By Manasvi Sharma

_______________________________________________

Manasvi Sharma is a 16-year-old student researcher and youth public health advocate focused on the intersection of neuroscience, mental health, and healthcare policy. She is the founder of The Mind Initiative (TMI), a youth-led organization advancing preventative mental wellness and brain health education and advocacy. Through her work, she seeks to improve people’s health and dignity by strengthening the social connections, support systems, and communities that shape wellbeing. Her long-term goal is to help build healthcare systems that recognize human connection as an essential component of health.

_______________________________________________

A Youth Perspective

For 114 days, a Florida woman named Mary Daniel did not touch her husband.

Steve had early-onset Alzheimer's. He lived in a memory care facility outside Jacksonville, the kind of place Mary used to visit every single night, helping him into pajamas, settling in for TV, tucking him in before she drove home. Then the pandemic closed the doors, and that ritual vanished overnight. She tried a window visit but Steve just cried. He couldn't understand why the glass was there, or why his wife of twenty-four years was suddenly a face he could see but not reach.

So Mary got a job as a dishwasher.

She passed the background check, the drug test, the TB test, twenty hours of training on food safety and hazardous waste, all so she could scrub pots two days a week inside the building where her husband lived, just to be near him. When she finally walked into the facility as an employee instead of a barred visitor, Steve looked up, touched her face through her mask, and said her name. He still knew her. Somewhere, underneath four months of confusion and isolation, that thread had held.

It shouldn't have taken a dishwashing job to keep a marriage of twenty-four years intact. But across the country, this was the choice families kept making, over and over: break the rules of the system, or watch someone you love disappear a little more each week.

We protected older adults from a virus. In the process, we too often severed them from the relationships that gave their lives comfort, structure, and identity. That tradeoff deserves a hard second look, not to assign blame, but because we are not done paying for what we missed.

For my generation, that tradeoff became part of our childhood. We remember our own version of isolation: empty classrooms, screens instead of friends, and the feeling of watching life continue from a distance. But ours eventually ended. We returned to classrooms, communities, and the simple comfort of being together again.

Grandparents and residents in long-term care didn't always get that ending. Some of them lost years they didn't have to spare. That gap between what our generation went through and what an older generation went through, quietly, behind glass, is exactly why I think this story belongs to youth as much as it belongs to Gray Panthers.

Isolation Is a Health Issue, Not Just an Emotional One

For decades, public health has measured success mostly in physical terms through infection rates, survival rates, and hospital capacity. 

COVID-19 forced a harder question into view: what happens to a person's mind, memory, and sense of self when the relationships that anchor them vanish?

The research answer is sobering. A nine-year study of over 5,000 older Medicare beneficiaries, led by Johns Hopkins researchers, found that socially isolated older adults developed dementia at a 27% higher rate than those who stayed connected. Isolation doesn't just feel bad, it appears to change the trajectory of the aging brain itself, likely by starving it of the cognitive engagement, stimulation, and stress-buffering that regular human contact provides.

For residents already living with memory loss, like Steve, the disappearance of a familiar face isn't a minor disruption. It can mean losing the one anchor still holding their sense of reality together. Mary said it plainly at the time: dementia patients need to be touched, need their brains stimulated, or they wither.

This is the piece that got left out of the pandemic response. Health is not only the absence of disease. It includes dignity. It includes belonging. It includes the people who know your history well enough to keep it alive when your own memory can't.

That 27% is the number that stops me every time I read it. We talk a lot about what isolation did to kids and teenagers during the pandemic – the learning loss, the mental health strain. We talk much less about what it did to the generation on the other end of the age spectrum, even though the biological stakes for them were, in many cases, higher and less reversible.

What the Long-Term Care Crisis Actually Revealed

The numbers on long-term care and COVID are staggering, and they're still being counted.

According to KFF, more than 200,000 residents and staff combined in long-term care facilities died from COVID-19, and that figure is likely an undercount, since it excludes some long-term care settings and reporting gaps in the data. Nationally, COVID-19 has killed roughly 1.2 million Americans. At the pandemic's start, long-term care deaths made up nearly half of all COVID deaths in the entire United States, even though residents make up less than one percent of the population.. Facilities weren't just overwhelmed medically. Many locked down completely, cutting residents off from family, ombudsmen, and outside oversight for months at a time.

This isn't a story about blaming nursing homes for doing something wrong. Infection control saved lives. It's a story about a system that was never built with a plan for protecting both physical safety and emotional survival at the same time because no one had ever been forced to weigh them against each other so starkly before.

Families are not passive visitors in a care setting. They're often the ones who catch a subtle change in mood before a chart does. They advocate when a resident can't advocate for themselves. They carry the continuity of identity: the inside jokes, the shared history, the simple recognition of a name that no staffing ratio can replace. When emergency protocols removed families entirely, facilities didn't just lose “visitors”, they lost a layer of care.

Emergency preparedness plans, going forward, need to treat that layer as infrastructure, not as an amenity to be switched off the moment things get hard.

The Essential Caregiver Movement: A Shift in How We Define Care

Mary Daniel didn't stop at her own reunion. She started a Facebook group called Caregivers for Compromise, which grew into a national movement pushing states, and eventually Congress, to guarantee family access even during emergencies.

That advocacy became part of a broader national movement for essential caregiver protections, including the Essential Caregivers Act, bipartisan legislation introduced in the Senate and House in December 2025 by Senators Richard Blumenthal and John Cornyn and Representatives Claudia Tenney and John Larson. In July 2026, the House Ways and Means Committee voted unanimously, 38–0, to advance the bill to the Energy and Commerce Committee before heading to the House floor.

The bill would guarantee every resident of a Medicare- or Medicaid-certified long-term care facility the right to designate at least one essential caregiver with in-person access, capping any emergency restriction at a firm 7 to 14 days, and requiring federal regulators to set clear safety guidelines rather than leaving facilities to lock down indefinitely.

The premise is quietly radical: what if a family caregiver were treated not as a visitor, but as a recognized part of a resident's care team? The bill doesn't ask facilities to abandon safety protocols. It asks them to build systems where safety and connection aren't treated as competing priorities. It writes into law what families already knew from the inside: presence is a form of care.

Not because it solves everything, it won't. But it puts something in writing that used to live only in the instincts of families like Mary Daniel's: that emotional and relational wellbeing is not separate from health, it's part of it.

Why This Belongs to Every Generation

It would be easy for a young person to see this as someone else's issue: a policy fight for older adults, decided by older adults, relevant to older adults. 

But that framing misses the point entirely.

Aging is not a category of people. It's a trajectory every one of us is on. The residents separated by glass in 2020 were someone's parent, grandparent, mentor, and neighbor. The systems we build now for long-term care are the systems many of us will eventually depend on ourselves, and the ones our own parents and grandparents may need far sooner.

Intergenerational solidarity isn't charity. It's self-interest with a longer memory. Young people belong in these conversations not to "save" older adults, who are not helpless and were never passive in this fight, many of the strongest advocates for the Essential Caregiver Act have been family members and older adults themselves, organizing, testifying, and pushing legislation forward. Young people belong in the room because the systems being built today will define what dignity looks like for every generation that follows, including our own.

What I Want to Do About It

I care about this issue because of a question I keep coming back to in my own work: what does it actually mean for a brain, and a person, to be healthy? Not just alive, healthy. The story of COVID and long-term care is proof that we have been answering that question too narrowly. We built a healthcare system that could measure a virus but couldn't measure a marriage held together through a dishwashing job, or a mind that stays intact because someone kept showing up.

That's the space I want to spend my future working in: the overlap between neuroscience, public health, and policy, where we stop treating connection, dignity, and mental wellbeing as extras and start treating them as clinical facts with clinical consequences. I don't think that work belongs only to researchers or policymakers decades from now. I think it starts with young people choosing, today, to take aging seriously as a public health issue instead of something we'll deal with later.

So this is where I'm starting: writing pieces like this one, translating research into stories people actually feel, and looking for the places where a youth voice can push open a door – whether that's connecting Gray Panthers' advocacy to youth policy spaces at the UN, or simply making sure the next person my age who hears "long-term care policy" doesn't assume it has nothing to do with them. 

The Essential Caregiver Act won't be the last policy fight like this one. I want to be someone who shows up for the next one too, helping build a healthcare system that protects both life and connection, because my generation will be responsible for what comes after it.

The glass windows are down now. The work of making sure we never need them again, and of building something more compassionate in their place, is just getting started. I plan on being part of it.

Sources:

• Mary and Steve Daniel's story: The Washington Post, "Mary Daniel became a dishwasher..."

• Social isolation and dementia risk: Johns Hopkins Medicine, "New Studies Suggest Social Isolation Is a Risk Factor for Dementia in Older Adults"

• Long-term care COVID-19 death toll: KFF, "Over 200,000 Residents and Staff in Long-Term Care Facilities Have Died From COVID-19"

• Essential Caregivers Act of 2025: Senator Blumenthal's press release, December 2025